German term
wofür... sprechen könnte
Having a bit of difficulty deciphering the second part of this sentence, taken from a medical report of a teenager:
Am ehesten handelt es sich u. E. bei den beschriebenen Episoden um eine Migraine ophthalmique, wofür bei dieser häufig hormonell assoziierten Erkrankung auch der zeitliche Zusammenhang mit der Menarche sprechen könnte.
My attempt:
In our opinion, the episodes described are most likely ophthalmic migraines, a frequently associated hormonal illness, which could be suggested by the temporal relationship with menarche.
I'm also wondering if, instead of menarche (as far as I am aware, the first period), it means just period.
Thank you for your suggestions!
Non-PRO (1): uyuni
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
further corroborated by [the patient's menarche]
I believe that you need to rephrase to make it sound more clearer.
One way of phrasing it is as follows:
In our opinion, the episodes described are most consistent with ophthalmic migraine; this suspicion is further corroborated by the temporal association with the menarche in this patient given that ophthalmic migraine is often hormonally mediated.
In your next question, I've offered three alternatives. Take your pick.
which could be indicated by ...
which might be accounted for...
which may be the reason why...
which seems to be born out by
This is not a medical field question.
neutral |
Steffen Walter
: borne out
13 hrs
|
Good catch. Ironically, this solution still seems to be the most readable to me, with or without typo.
|
Something went wrong...